Paper-based certificates can be forged
EASA Form 1 and FAA 8130-3 authenticate the document — not the metal. AOG Technics proved this the hard way: a printer, a computer, 60,000 forgeries. The system didn’t detect a thing.
The surface microstructure of every metal part is unique, unchangeable and physically irreproducible. ID Systems AG turns it into a digital ID — the first approach that authenticates the part itself, not the document.
Anything that can be separated from the physical part can be forged or transferred. This is the fundamental weakness common to all previous approaches.
EASA Form 1 and FAA 8130-3 authenticate the document — not the metal. AOG Technics proved this the hard way: a printer, a computer, 60,000 forgeries. The system didn’t detect a thing.
Bolts, bushings, seals, washers — no serial number, no tracking system, no identification. CFM International: it was precisely these parts that made up the majority of AOG Technics’ counterfeits. No existing system addresses this.
An RFID tag identifies itself — not the part to which it is attached. When re-affixed to a counterfeit part, it confirms its authenticity. The vulnerability is conceptual, not technical.
Life-Limited Parts must be traceable ‘back-to-birth’. Any gap devalues parts worth millions, jeopardises airworthiness and creates legal risks in leasing transactions.
The crucial question for every Quality Manager, MRO Director and Chief Engineer:
‘Can I prove beyond doubt today that the part in my hand is identical to the one in my documentation chain — regardless of the quality of the accompanying paperwork?’
With all existing methods, the honest answer is: Only to a limited extent. With the surface fingerprint: Yes — in seconds, with absolute physical certainty.
Every metal surface — titanium, steel, aluminium, Inconel — carries a unique microstructure created during manufacturing, random in nature, and physically impossible to reproduce. ID Systems AG captures this structure and converts it into a digital passport for the part.
The green contour lines visualise the algorithmically captured surface microstructure. Each line is a unique characteristic — together they form a digital hash that identifies the part beyond dispute. The detail inset (bottom right) shows the sub-microscopic topography, which is physically impossible to reproduce even under identical manufacturing conditions. This is the fingerprint that makes every bolt, bushing or LLP uniquely and permanently identifiable.
High-precision, non-contact optical scan of the component surface. The part remains completely unchanged — no intervention, no marking, no certification obligation on the part itself. Compatible with high-volume production environments.
The microstructure is converted into a unique digital hash and stored securely. Compatible with blockchain systems, MRO software (AMOS, SAP), ERP, and existing aviation documentation platforms.
At every receiving inspection, maintenance check, lease return, or installation: new scan, automatic database comparison, proof of authenticity in seconds — even after years in service, after sterilisation, after disassembly and reassembly.
Every scan adds an entry to the part's provenance chain. Complete traceability from manufacture to retirement — the physical anchor that makes blockchain documentation genuinely secure and every LLP record unassailable.
The part remains unchanged. No certification obligation on the part itself. Decisive for aviation regulatory compliance.
The microstructure cannot be copied, transferred, or reproduced. Zero attack surface for manipulation of any kind.
Bolts, bushings, seals — physically uniquely identifiable for the first time. Closes the industry's biggest authentication gap.
Validated for steel, titanium, aluminium, Inconel. All common aviation alloys covered across all part categories.
Validated in watchmaking and medical technology (sterilisation, implants per ISO 13485) — direct transfer to aviation environments.
The physical anchor that makes blockchain part documentation genuinely manipulation-proof and legally defensible.
RFID, blockchain, laser engraving — they all share the same vulnerability: they can be separated from the physical component. Anything that can be separated can be forged, transferred or imitated.
| Method | Physically bound? | Non-serialised parts? | Intervention on the part? | Can it be forged? | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EASA Form 1 / FAA 8130-3 | No — paper separable | Only with SN | No | Yes — verified | Insufficient |
| RFID / barcode / QR tags | No — tag detachable | No | Tag must be affixed | Yes — tag transferable | Weak |
| Laser engraving / dot-peen | To a limited extent — engraving can be replicated | To a limited extent | Yes — alters material | Possible to a limited extent | Medium |
| Blockchain (only) | No — no physical anchor | No | No | No partial protection | Supplementary |
| Surface fingerprint (IDS) | Yes — inseparable from the material | Yes — even without a serial number | No — no intervention required | No — physically impossible | 100% forgery-proof |
From incoming inspection to OEM manufacturing — the fingerprint accompanies the part through every step of the global aviation supply chain.
Bolts, bushings, seals, washers, dampers — the parts that AOG Technics has most frequently counterfeited, and for which there is still no physical identification solution to this day. With the fingerprint, every single fastener can, for the first time, be uniquely, permanently and physically authenticated — without a serial number or marking.
Turbine blades, landing gear components, brake discs — EASA and the FAA require back-to-birth traceability. The fingerprint is the immutable physical anchor of this chain: even if paper documents are incomplete or called into question, the identity of the part remains verifiable. No assets worth millions are lost due to gaps in documentation.
Used as an internal inspection aid during Receiving Inspection (FAA AC 20-154), the fingerprint does not require EASA/FAA approval on the part. This is the quickest route to a measurable ROI: immediate implementation without regulatory lead time, without process adjustments, and without intervention. The ideal starting point for Certified Aircraft Maintenance Organisations.
In aircraft asset transfers between lessors and airlines, LLP verification is one of the most costly and time-consuming processes. Gaps in documentation can devalue parts worth millions. The fingerprint provides unique, physically irrefutable proof of identity — regardless of the quality of the accompanying documentation.
Figures that prove: the need is real, demand is supported by regulation, and the window of opportunity for early adopters is open now.
Requires traceability for aeronautical parts without defining a specific technical procedure. This regulatory flexibility allows surface fingerprinting to be recognised as ‘Acceptable Means of Compliance’ — no legislative procedure required.
Explicitly identifies the gaps in physical authentication methods for non-serialised parts, without closing them. Creates regulatory demand without a solution — precisely the position occupied by ID Systems AG.
Airbus, Boeing, GE Aerospace and Safran have launched a joint initiative against counterfeit parts and are actively seeking technical partners. Early adopters gain direct access to top-level OEM decision-makers.
SR Technics (Zurich), Swiss Aviation Services, Swiss AviationSoftware and direct access to the FOCA provide ideal conditions for a pilot project. ‘Swissness’ as a factor of quality and trust among international aviation customers.
Each phase adds value in its own right. Phase 1 begins without any regulatory lead-in — immediately, with measurable benefits from the very first deployment.
Used as an internal inspection aid in receiving inspection. No certification required — the system does not form part of the official airworthiness documentation, but is used as a quality control tool. By way of analogy: callipers or borescopes do not require component certification either.
Positioning as ‘Acceptable Means of Compliance’ in accordance with EASA Regulation 1321/2014, Article 145.A.42. Dialogue with the FOCA and the EASA Rulemaking Department. Involvement of a Designated Engineering Representative (DER). Joint certification application with pilot customers.
Fingerprint capture directly from the OEM’s production line — the part receives its digital ID before it leaves the factory. Partnership via the Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition. Integration into OEM quality systems. Maximum supply chain integrity from manufacture to decommissioning.
Comprehensive analysis for MRO operators, airlines, aircraft manufacturers and OEM quality teams.
15 pages · Fact-based · For technical and commercial decision-makers
Download white paper PDF · Free · No form requiredAlso available as a DOCX file — please enquire if interested.
Answers to technical and regulatory questions regarding surface fingerprint technology in aviation.
To date, this has mainly been done through paper-based document checks (EASA Form 1, FAA 8130-3) and visual inspection. The AOG Technics case (2019–2026) demonstrated that these methods are structurally inadequate: 60,000 counterfeit certificates passed through all existing checks undetected. ID Systems AG’s surface fingerprint technology is the first method to authenticate the physical material itself — without marking, without intervention, and regardless of the document’s quality.
Non-serialised parts — bolts, nuts, washers, seals, bushings, dampers — do not have individual serial numbers. They are invisible to all existing digital tracking systems and cannot be traced back to their point of manufacture. Following the AOG Technics scandal, CFM International confirmed that the majority of the counterfeit parts involved fell into this category. ID Systems AG’s surface fingerprint technology is the only scalable solution that makes even these parts physically and individually identifiable — without any marking whatsoever.
No. The scan is a purely contactless, optical reading process. The part remains entirely in its original condition — no physical alteration, no marking, no intervention. This is a crucial regulatory advantage: Unlike laser engraving or RFID tags, the scanning system does not require certification on the part itself. Used as an internal inspection aid in Phase 1, the system is not subject to EASA/FAA certification requirements.
The key EASA requirement is Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014, Article 145.A.42, which mandates traceability for all aeronautical parts used in maintenance — without defining a specific technical procedure. This flexibility allows surface fingerprinting to be positioned as an ‘Acceptable Means of Compliance’. On the FAA side, Advisory Circular AC 21-29D addresses Suspected Unapproved Parts (SUPs) and explicitly identifies gaps in physical authentication procedures. ID Systems AG actively supports partners through the regulatory process, including dialogue with the FOCA and the involvement of DER experts.
The technology is material-neutral and has been validated for all common metallic aerospace materials: steel (various alloys), titanium (Ti-6Al-4V and others), aluminium (2024, 7075 and other alloys), Inconel and other nickel-based superalloys. For composite materials (carbon fibre-reinforced plastic, glass fibre-reinforced plastic), material-specific validations are possible as part of the pilot project. The technology is already being used successfully in the watchmaking industry (titanium, steel, stainless steel) and medical technology (surgical steel, titanium implants in accordance with ISO 13485, sterilisable).
Blockchain systems secure documentation records in an immutable manner — but without a physical anchor, the link between the data record and the physical part remains vulnerable. If the part itself does not have a unique physical identity, a counterfeit part can be linked to a genuine data record. The surface fingerprint is the physical anchor that makes blockchain systems truly secure: The microstructure links the physical metal inseparably to the digital record. For optimal use, both technologies are combined — in 2024, Lufthansa Technik introduced a blockchain system for parts documentation that requires precisely such a physical anchor.
The quickest way to get started is Phase 1: Use as an internal inspection aid in your receiving inspection — no approval process required, no modification to the part, immediate start. ID Systems AG offers structured pilot programmes with defined test scenarios, clear success criteria and full technical support. Contact: [email protected] or +41 32 374 71 11. Contact: Technical Management, ID Systems AG, Lyss, Switzerland.
Sie sind noch nicht sicher, welches Produkt am besten für Ihre Einsatzwecke geeignet ist? Zögern Sie nicht und kontaktieren Sie uns für ein Beratungsgespräch oder für eine unverbindliche Offerte. Rufen Sie uns einfach an:
Zentrale: 032 374 71 11