All existing methods check the document — not the part

Anything that can be separated from the physical part can be forged or transferred. This is the fundamental weakness common to all previous approaches.

Paper-based certificates can be forged

EASA Form 1 and FAA 8130-3 authenticate the document — not the metal. AOG Technics proved this the hard way: a printer, a computer, 60,000 forgeries. The system didn’t detect a thing.

Non-serialised parts: the blind spot

Bolts, bushings, seals, washers — no serial number, no tracking system, no identification. CFM International: it was precisely these parts that made up the majority of AOG Technics’ counterfeits. No existing system addresses this.

RFID & Tags: detachable, transferable

An RFID tag identifies itself — not the part to which it is attached. When re-affixed to a counterfeit part, it confirms its authenticity. The vulnerability is conceptual, not technical.

LLP documentation gaps: A risk running into millions

Life-Limited Parts must be traceable ‘back-to-birth’. Any gap devalues parts worth millions, jeopardises airworthiness and creates legal risks in leasing transactions.

The crucial question for every Quality Manager, MRO Director and Chief Engineer:

‘Can I prove beyond doubt today that the part in my hand is identical to the one in my documentation chain — regardless of the quality of the accompanying paperwork?’

With all existing methods, the honest answer is: Only to a limited extent. With the surface fingerprint: Yes — in seconds, with absolute physical certainty.

Surface Fingerprint Technology

Every metal surface — titanium, steel, aluminium, Inconel — carries a unique microstructure created during manufacturing, random in nature, and physically impossible to reproduce. ID Systems AG captures this structure and converts it into a digital passport for the part.

ID Systems AG surface fingerprint scan: top view of an aircraft bolt. Green algorithmic contour lines capture the unique microstructure of the metal surface. The detail inset shows the sub-microscopic surface topography — the basis of the digital fingerprint that makes every part uniquely and permanently identifiable.
Green lines = digitised surface microstructure topography
Scan reference point (centre)
Inset: sub-microscopic surface topography
Actual scan image Surface fingerprint of an aircraft bolt

The green contour lines visualise the algorithmically captured surface microstructure. Each line is a unique characteristic — together they form a digital hash that identifies the part beyond dispute. The detail inset (bottom right) shows the sub-microscopic topography, which is physically impossible to reproduce even under identical manufacturing conditions. This is the fingerprint that makes every bolt, bushing or LLP uniquely and permanently identifiable.

HOW IT WORKS — 4 STEPS

01

Initial scan — non-contact, in seconds

High-precision, non-contact optical scan of the component surface. The part remains completely unchanged — no intervention, no marking, no certification obligation on the part itself. Compatible with high-volume production environments.

02

Digital fingerprint — unique and immutable

The microstructure is converted into a unique digital hash and stored securely. Compatible with blockchain systems, MRO software (AMOS, SAP), ERP, and existing aviation documentation platforms.

03

Authentication — anywhere, at any time

At every receiving inspection, maintenance check, lease return, or installation: new scan, automatic database comparison, proof of authenticity in seconds — even after years in service, after sterilisation, after disassembly and reassembly.

04

Back-to-birth traceability — EASA-compliant

Every scan adds an entry to the part's provenance chain. Complete traceability from manufacture to retirement — the physical anchor that makes blockchain documentation genuinely secure and every LLP record unassailable.

Key advantages

No marking — no intervention

The part remains unchanged. No certification obligation on the part itself. Decisive for aviation regulatory compliance.

100% counterfeit-proof

The microstructure cannot be copied, transferred, or reproduced. Zero attack surface for manipulation of any kind.

Non-serialized parts included

Bolts, bushings, seals — physically uniquely identifiable for the first time. Closes the industry's biggest authentication gap.

Material-neutral

Validated for steel, titanium, aluminium, Inconel. All common aviation alloys covered across all part categories.

Proven in regulated industries

Validated in watchmaking and medical technology (sterilisation, implants per ISO 13485) — direct transfer to aviation environments.

Blockchain-ready

The physical anchor that makes blockchain part documentation genuinely manipulation-proof and legally defensible.

Why existing solutions are not enough

RFID, blockchain, laser engraving — they all share the same vulnerability: they can be separated from the physical component. Anything that can be separated can be forged, transferred or imitated.

Method Physically bound? Non-serialised parts? Intervention on the part? Can it be forged? Assessment
EASA Form 1 / FAA 8130-3 No — paper separable Only with SN No Yes — verified Insufficient
RFID / barcode / QR tags No — tag detachable No Tag must be affixed Yes — tag transferable Weak
Laser engraving / dot-peen To a limited extent — engraving can be replicated To a limited extent Yes — alters material Possible to a limited extent Medium
Blockchain (only) No — no physical anchor No No No partial protection Supplementary
Surface fingerprint (IDS) Yes — inseparable from the material Yes — even without a serial number No — no intervention required No — physically impossible 100% forgery-proof

Where you’ll see immediate benefits

From incoming inspection to OEM manufacturing — the fingerprint accompanies the part through every step of the global aviation supply chain.

Non-serialised parts

Top priority

Bolts, bushings, seals, washers, dampers — the parts that AOG Technics has most frequently counterfeited, and for which there is still no physical identification solution to this day. With the fingerprint, every single fastener can, for the first time, be uniquely, permanently and physically authenticated — without a serial number or marking.

Life-Limited Parts (LLPs)

Very high fit

Turbine blades, landing gear components, brake discs — EASA and the FAA require back-to-birth traceability. The fingerprint is the immutable physical anchor of this chain: even if paper documents are incomplete or called into question, the identity of the part remains verifiable. No assets worth millions are lost due to gaps in documentation.

MRO receiving inspection

Ready for immediate use

Used as an internal inspection aid during Receiving Inspection (FAA AC 20-154), the fingerprint does not require EASA/FAA approval on the part. This is the quickest route to a measurable ROI: immediate implementation without regulatory lead time, without process adjustments, and without intervention. The ideal starting point for Certified Aircraft Maintenance Organisations.

Leasing transactions & asset transfers

High fit

In aircraft asset transfers between lessors and airlines, LLP verification is one of the most costly and time-consuming processes. Gaps in documentation can devalue parts worth millions. The fingerprint provides unique, physically irrefutable proof of identity — regardless of the quality of the accompanying documentation.

The scale of the problem — based on facts

Figures that prove: the need is real, demand is supported by regulation, and the window of opportunity for early adopters is open now.

$87 billion
Global aviation MRO market volume in 2025
Industry analysis 2024
520,000
Counterfeit / unauthorised parts per year
FAA Advisory Circular AC 21-29D
60,000
Counterfeit EASA certificates — AOG Technics
SFO / Southwark Crown Court judgement, Feb. 2026
145
Affected CFM56 engines requiring emergency inspection
CFM International, 2023, officially confirmed

EASA Regulation (EU) 1321/2014, Art. 145.A.42

Requires traceability for aeronautical parts without defining a specific technical procedure. This regulatory flexibility allows surface fingerprinting to be recognised as ‘Acceptable Means of Compliance’ — no legislative procedure required.

FAA Advisory Circular AC 21-29D

Explicitly identifies the gaps in physical authentication methods for non-serialised parts, without closing them. Creates regulatory demand without a solution — precisely the position occupied by ID Systems AG.

Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition 2024

Airbus, Boeing, GE Aerospace and Safran have launched a joint initiative against counterfeit parts and are actively seeking technical partners. Early adopters gain direct access to top-level OEM decision-makers.

Swiss MRO Cluster & FOCA Advantage

SR Technics (Zurich), Swiss Aviation Services, Swiss AviationSoftware and direct access to the FOCA provide ideal conditions for a pilot project. ‘Swissness’ as a factor of quality and trust among international aviation customers.

From evaluation to operational system — in 3 phases

Each phase adds value in its own right. Phase 1 begins without any regulatory lead-in — immediately, with measurable benefits from the very first deployment.

Phase 1 · 0–12 months

MRO pilot project

Used as an internal inspection aid in receiving inspection. No certification required — the system does not form part of the official airworthiness documentation, but is used as a quality control tool. By way of analogy: callipers or borescopes do not require component certification either.

Immediate launch · No regulatory risk · First evidence of ROI
Phase 2 · 12–24 months

Regulatory recognition

Positioning as ‘Acceptable Means of Compliance’ in accordance with EASA Regulation 1321/2014, Article 145.A.42. Dialogue with the FOCA and the EASA Rulemaking Department. Involvement of a Designated Engineering Representative (DER). Joint certification application with pilot customers.

EASA dialogue · FOCA contact · Joint MRO application
Phase 3 · 24–48 months

OEM integration

Fingerprint capture directly from the OEM’s production line — the part receives its digital ID before it leaves the factory. Partnership via the Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition. Integration into OEM quality systems. Maximum supply chain integrity from manufacture to decommissioning.

Safran · GE Aerospace · Airbus · Boeing · Coalition

White paper: Counterfeit-proof component identification in the aviation industry

Comprehensive analysis for MRO operators, airlines, aircraft manufacturers and OEM quality teams.

  • Fact-based problem analysis — AOG Technics, FAA data, EASA regulations
  • Comprehensive comparison of all authentication approaches
  • 4 specific use cases with ROI potential
  • 3-phase implementation plan — Phase 1 without certification requirements
  • Direct contact for your pilot project
White paper — PDF

15 pages · Fact-based · For technical and commercial decision-makers

Download white paper PDF · Free · No form required

Also available as a DOCX file — please enquire if interested.

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to technical and regulatory questions regarding surface fingerprint technology in aviation.

How are counterfeit aircraft parts (Suspected Unapproved Parts) currently detected?

To date, this has mainly been done through paper-based document checks (EASA Form 1, FAA 8130-3) and visual inspection. The AOG Technics case (2019–2026) demonstrated that these methods are structurally inadequate: 60,000 counterfeit certificates passed through all existing checks undetected. ID Systems AG’s surface fingerprint technology is the first method to authenticate the physical material itself — without marking, without intervention, and regardless of the document’s quality.

What are non-serialised aircraft parts and why do they pose a particular security risk?

Non-serialised parts — bolts, nuts, washers, seals, bushings, dampers — do not have individual serial numbers. They are invisible to all existing digital tracking systems and cannot be traced back to their point of manufacture. Following the AOG Technics scandal, CFM International confirmed that the majority of the counterfeit parts involved fell into this category. ID Systems AG’s surface fingerprint technology is the only scalable solution that makes even these parts physically and individually identifiable — without any marking whatsoever.

Does the fingerprint scan alter or damage the component?

No. The scan is a purely contactless, optical reading process. The part remains entirely in its original condition — no physical alteration, no marking, no intervention. This is a crucial regulatory advantage: Unlike laser engraving or RFID tags, the scanning system does not require certification on the part itself. Used as an internal inspection aid in Phase 1, the system is not subject to EASA/FAA certification requirements.

What EASA and FAA requirements apply to the traceability of aerospace parts?

The key EASA requirement is Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014, Article 145.A.42, which mandates traceability for all aeronautical parts used in maintenance — without defining a specific technical procedure. This flexibility allows surface fingerprinting to be positioned as an ‘Acceptable Means of Compliance’. On the FAA side, Advisory Circular AC 21-29D addresses Suspected Unapproved Parts (SUPs) and explicitly identifies gaps in physical authentication procedures. ID Systems AG actively supports partners through the regulatory process, including dialogue with the FOCA and the involvement of DER experts.

For which materials and part types has the technology been validated?

The technology is material-neutral and has been validated for all common metallic aerospace materials: steel (various alloys), titanium (Ti-6Al-4V and others), aluminium (2024, 7075 and other alloys), Inconel and other nickel-based superalloys. For composite materials (carbon fibre-reinforced plastic, glass fibre-reinforced plastic), material-specific validations are possible as part of the pilot project. The technology is already being used successfully in the watchmaking industry (titanium, steel, stainless steel) and medical technology (surgical steel, titanium implants in accordance with ISO 13485, sterilisable).

How does the surface fingerprint differ from blockchain-based traceability systems?

Blockchain systems secure documentation records in an immutable manner — but without a physical anchor, the link between the data record and the physical part remains vulnerable. If the part itself does not have a unique physical identity, a counterfeit part can be linked to a genuine data record. The surface fingerprint is the physical anchor that makes blockchain systems truly secure: The microstructure links the physical metal inseparably to the digital record. For optimal use, both technologies are combined — in 2024, Lufthansa Technik introduced a blockchain system for parts documentation that requires precisely such a physical anchor.

How do I start a pilot project with ID Systems AG?

The quickest way to get started is Phase 1: Use as an internal inspection aid in your receiving inspection — no approval process required, no modification to the part, immediate start. ID Systems AG offers structured pilot programmes with defined test scenarios, clear success criteria and full technical support. Contact: [email protected] or +41 32 374 71 11. Contact: Technical Management, ID Systems AG, Lyss, Switzerland.

Beratung

Sie sind noch nicht sicher, welches Produkt am besten für Ihre Einsatzwecke geeignet ist? Zögern Sie nicht und kontaktieren Sie uns für ein Beratungsgespräch oder für eine unverbindliche Offerte. Rufen Sie uns einfach an:   

Zentrale: 032 374 71 11 

AI Assistant

Online

Data Protection Consent

This chatbot uses external AI services (Google Gemini, OpenAI, or remote server) to process and answer your queries. By clicking Accept, you agree that your questions and conversation data will be sent to these external services for processing.

Close Chat?

Are you sure you want to close this chat? This will clear your chat history and start a new session.

Hallo! Wie kann ich Ihnen helfen?